Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Potential and Limitations of Claims-Based Data
In order for states to sustain support for medical home projects, they will need to show results. Do these projects improve care and contain costs? Can claims-based Medicaid data provide answers to these questions? Hear about the pros and cons of using claims-based data as well as other sources of Medicaid data to evaluate medical home projects from national and state experts including:
- Speaker: Mark Friedberg, MD, MPP, Associate Natural Scientist from RAND Corporation
View Speaker Report - Speaker: Deidre Gifford, MD, MPH, Project Director for the Rhode Island Chronic Care Sustainability Initiative
View Speaker Report - Speaker: Patricia Johnson, RN, BS, Quality Assurance/Improvement Director, Oklahoma Health Care Authority:
View Speaker Report - Speaker: Kelly Botten, BS, Reimbursement Manager, Oklahoma Health Care Authority
- Speaker: Mary Takach, MPH, RN, NASHP Program Manager

For individuals living with complex, often chronic conditions, and their families, palliative care can provide relief from symptoms, improve satisfaction and outcomes, and help address critical mental and spiritual needs during difficult times. Now more than ever, there is growing recognition of the importance of palliative care services for individuals with serious illness, such as advance care planning, pain and symptom management, care coordination, and team-based, multi-disciplinary support. These services can help patients and families cope with the symptoms and stressors of disease, better anticipate and avoid crises, and reduce unnecessary and/or unwanted care. While this model is grounded in evidence that demonstrates improved quality of life, better outcomes, and reduced cost for patients, only a fraction of individuals who could benefit from palliative care receive it. 























































































































































