Help Plan NASHP’s Annual Conference!
Informal Call for Ideas | Submissions due by March 17, 2017
As the health policy community across the nation engages in discussions about the future of the ACA, three things are clear 1. Uncertainty poses challenges for state policymakers 2. Not withstanding, state leaders have programs to run and people to serve, even as the policy debate continues and 3. NASHP will hold its 30th Annual State Health Policy Conference October 23-25, 2017 in Portland, Oregon to explore these emerging issues and opportunities and focus on innovation and reform underway at the state level.
NASHP invites you to help construct the agenda for the 30th Annual State Health Policy Conference. We welcome all ideas for topics and speakers and we will organize the agenda to accommodate late breaking developments. Your submission can be as simple as a sentence or two describing your idea (no more than 65 words) and should be submitted electronically.
All submissions are due by Friday, March 17. All submissions received by the deadline will be shared with NASHP’s conference planning committee, state leaders who volunteer their time to plan our agendas. If your idea is incorporated into the agenda, NASHP staff will follow up with you by June 30, 2017.
Thank you for your interest in NASHP’s Annual State Health Policy Conference, and for joining NASHP in its commitment to promoting excellence in state health policy and practice. We hope to see you in Portland!

For individuals living with complex, often chronic conditions, and their families, palliative care can provide relief from symptoms, improve satisfaction and outcomes, and help address critical mental and spiritual needs during difficult times. Now more than ever, there is growing recognition of the importance of palliative care services for individuals with serious illness, such as advance care planning, pain and symptom management, care coordination, and team-based, multi-disciplinary support. These services can help patients and families cope with the symptoms and stressors of disease, better anticipate and avoid crises, and reduce unnecessary and/or unwanted care. While this model is grounded in evidence that demonstrates improved quality of life, better outcomes, and reduced cost for patients, only a fraction of individuals who could benefit from palliative care receive it. 























































































































































