Opening the Toolbox: Resources for States Seeking to Improve Health Care for Children in Foster Care
Three years ago, the Nathan E. Cummings Foundation recognized the problem of foster children’s access to health care and funded the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) to develop the State Institute on Improving Health Care for Children in Foster Care. The Institute had three goals: to provide ongoing technical assistance to five states (Alaska, California, Massachusetts, Texas, and Utah) in improving delivery of health care services for foster children through interagency collaboration among Medicaid, Child Welfare, and other relevant services in each state; to publish reports on key topics; and to serve as a resource for others concerned about providing health care for this high-need population. As part of this effort, NASHP has collected resource documents from states making efforts to address the barriers faced by children in foster care in accessing health care. Some of those documents are from the Institute states. Others were sent with responses to a nationwide survey conducted by NASHP on access to health care for children in foster care. The Toolbox does not include all the documents collected. Instead, we have sought to include a sampling of items we hope will be helpful to many states.
| 1999.Dec_.resources.seeking.improve.health.care_.children.foster.care_.pdf | 54.2 MB |

For individuals living with complex, often chronic conditions, and their families, palliative care can provide relief from symptoms, improve satisfaction and outcomes, and help address critical mental and spiritual needs during difficult times. Now more than ever, there is growing recognition of the importance of palliative care services for individuals with serious illness, such as advance care planning, pain and symptom management, care coordination, and team-based, multi-disciplinary support. These services can help patients and families cope with the symptoms and stressors of disease, better anticipate and avoid crises, and reduce unnecessary and/or unwanted care. While this model is grounded in evidence that demonstrates improved quality of life, better outcomes, and reduced cost for patients, only a fraction of individuals who could benefit from palliative care receive it. 























































































































































