Roundtable Discussion: From Evidence to Policy
Thursday, August 16th
1:30 pm – 3:00 pm
This roundtable discussion will provide conference participants with an opportunity to engage with key questions under exploration by NASHP’s Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Work Group:
1) What factors do policymakers consider when deciding if evidence merits action?
2) When action is merited, how can evidence be most effectively implemented? What policy levers, strategies, or tools can state health policymakers use to put evidence into practice?
3) How should research findings be framed to meet the specific needs of policymakers? What are the important pieces of contextual information that can make research findings more relevant to policymakers and more likely to be implemented effectively?
This roundtable is supported by a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Engagement Award.

For individuals living with complex, often chronic conditions, and their families, palliative care can provide relief from symptoms, improve satisfaction and outcomes, and help address critical mental and spiritual needs during difficult times. Now more than ever, there is growing recognition of the importance of palliative care services for individuals with serious illness, such as advance care planning, pain and symptom management, care coordination, and team-based, multi-disciplinary support. These services can help patients and families cope with the symptoms and stressors of disease, better anticipate and avoid crises, and reduce unnecessary and/or unwanted care. While this model is grounded in evidence that demonstrates improved quality of life, better outcomes, and reduced cost for patients, only a fraction of individuals who could benefit from palliative care receive it. 























































































































































