How CHIP Can Help Meet Child Specific Requirements and Needs in the Exchange
Dowload presentation here (PDF)
Health insurance exchanges or marketplaces need to be prepared to serve children’s needs as well as adults. The Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), an already established and tested program, offers features that can help states meet ACA exchange requirements while establishing good coverage for children. With support from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, NASHP analyzed federal statutes, regulations, and guidance for CHIP and exchanges, and interviewed state and national experts to inform this work. The resulting brief offers options for drawing on CHIP as a tool to inform exchange design and the companion piece compares selected CHIP and exchange requirements and identifies ways the program requirements align. This webinar geared toward state exchange officials includes a discussion of options on ways CHIP could be used to inform the design of Essential Health Benefits, provider networks and more. Officials working with all types of exchanges—State Based, Partnership, and Federally Facilitated—are encouraged to listen.
Speakers:
Moderator: Catherine Hess, Managing Director for Coverage and Access, NASHP
Presenter: Maureen Hensley-Quinn, Program Manager, NASHP
Discussants:
Miriam Fordham, Director, Health Care Policy Administration
William Nold, Deputy Director, Kentucky Health Benefit Exchange
Lisa Lee, Director, Kentucky CHIP Program

By
For individuals living with complex, often chronic conditions, and their families, palliative care can provide relief from symptoms, improve satisfaction and outcomes, and help address critical mental and spiritual needs during difficult times. Now more than ever, there is growing recognition of the importance of palliative care services for individuals with serious illness, such as advance care planning, pain and symptom management, care coordination, and team-based, multi-disciplinary support. These services can help patients and families cope with the symptoms and stressors of disease, better anticipate and avoid crises, and reduce unnecessary and/or unwanted care. While this model is grounded in evidence that demonstrates improved quality of life, better outcomes, and reduced cost for patients, only a fraction of individuals who could benefit from palliative care receive it. 























































































































































