Medical Malpractice and Medical Error Disclosure: Balancing Facts and Fears
This policy brief addresses the issues raised by the convergence of medical error reporting and the fear of medical malpractice litigation. It discusses how states protect data with the intention of increasing the compliance level of reporting, examines a sample state protection statute, and explores recent proposals for alternatives that would address the reluctance of many providers to report for fear of possible malpractice litigation.
Contents
Introduction.
Possible Connections Between Mandatory Reporting and Malpractice Litigation.
State Strategies to Protect Data and Increase Reporting.
Including Comprehensive Protection of Data as an Integral part of the System-Authorizing Statutes.
Tort Reform.
Conclusion.
Appendix A: Selected State Tort Reform Measures.
Appendix B: Recent State Malpractice Legislative Activity re: Tort Reform (1999-2003)
| balancing_facts_fears.pdf | 239.2 KB |

For individuals living with complex, often chronic conditions, and their families, palliative care can provide relief from symptoms, improve satisfaction and outcomes, and help address critical mental and spiritual needs during difficult times. Now more than ever, there is growing recognition of the importance of palliative care services for individuals with serious illness, such as advance care planning, pain and symptom management, care coordination, and team-based, multi-disciplinary support. These services can help patients and families cope with the symptoms and stressors of disease, better anticipate and avoid crises, and reduce unnecessary and/or unwanted care. While this model is grounded in evidence that demonstrates improved quality of life, better outcomes, and reduced cost for patients, only a fraction of individuals who could benefit from palliative care receive it. 























































































































































