2022 State of the State Addresses Reflect Realities of Health, Economic Recovery
/in Health Coverage and Access Blogs Chronic and Complex Populations, Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Featured Policy Home, Health Coverage and Access, Health System Costs, Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health, Population Health, Prescription Drug Pricing /by Allie Atkeson, Anita Cardwell, Clare Cartheuser, Rebecca Cooper, Gia Gould and Elinor HigginsGovernors use their annual state-of-the-state addresses to showcase successes and accomplishments over the past year and to define their policy priorities for the year ahead. This year 36 states will hold gubernatorial elections, so many governors use their state-of-the-state addresses to build their case for reelection and visions for the future. By late February, 41 governors had delivered speeches outlining plans to address a wide variety of health and economic related issues in the coming year, as the immediate health-related emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic has faded. Most governors reflected on the incredible response from frontline responders and public health agencies’ ability to meet the needs of the crisis but focused their future plans on how to emerge from the pandemic and respond to the economic and mental health crises that remain.
View a map highlighting governors’ goals on a variety of health-related policies here.
Priorities diverged from their 2021 health care and social determinants priorities. While many governors continued to address social drivers of health, citing affordable housing and access to healthy food and the environment as key levers to improve health, more highlighted livable wages, support for the workforce and business, and education. Notably, in comparison to last year, many more governors highlighted the need to address health care workforce shortages that have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis. Governors also mentioned their priorities for investing American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding.
These issues do not exist in isolation; many of these topics, including mental health, education, workforce, and equity, are woven throughout the speeches and require a whole-of-government approach to address. Below are highlights from key themes that the governors addressed.
Behavioral Health
Twenty-eight governors discussed behavioral health in their speeches this year, up from 22 last year. With an increased focus on crisis services, substance use disorder services and school-based mental health care as a result of COVID-19, governors addressed the need for investments in behavioral health services and workforce.
Fourteen governors mentioned making significant investments in behavioral health in their state-of-the- state addresses. In Idaho, Gov. Little proposed accelerating the implementation of the Behavioral Health Council’s recommendations, including a $50 million dollar investment in behavioral health care. In the executive budget, Gov. Lujan Grisham of New Mexico is proposing “tens of millions of dollars into new behavioral health services, expanding access to treatment for substance abuse, suicide interventions and more. New Mexicans call me about this issue more than almost any other, and we will answer that call.”
Ten governors mentioned substance use disorder, including the opioid epidemic and recent rises in overdoses over the past year. New Jersey Gov. Murphy discussed the state’s data driven approach to the opioid-use epidemic and expansion of harm reduction centers and naloxone.
In Delaware and Tennessee, governors discussed their executive branch efforts to combat the opioid epidemic. In Delaware, the Behavioral Health Consortium is led by Lt. Gov. Hall-Long, and the state was one of a few to see a decrease in the rate of overdose deaths. In Tennessee, Attorney General Slatery is working to deploy funding from the $26 billion dollar suit against pharmaceutical companies. Governors in Alaska and Missouri discussed providing behavioral health services to individuals in the criminal justice system.
Nine governors referenced youth behavioral health and school-based services now that children are back in the classroom. In Alabama, Michigan, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin, governors proposed additional school mental health supports. Gov. McMaster in South Carolina stated, “we must also recognize that a mental health crisis exists in South Carolina, especially among our young people who have weathered two years of disruptions, virtual instruction, isolation, and constant changes to normal routines.” He also directed the Health and Human Services Director to study the state’s behavioral health system as 60 percent of South Carolina children are enrolled in Medicaid. In Washington, Gov. Inslee’s budget will increase the number of school counselors, nurses, psychologists, and social workers in schools.
Six governors discussed strengthening the crisis system of care in their states through outreach services, mobile unitsand new centers. Gov. Ivey of Alabama proposed funding for two new mental health crisis centers and in New Hampshire, Gov. Sununu discussed mobile crisis support and a new 24/7 crisis call center. Alaska Gov. Dunleavy announced reopening the unit that serves adolescents in crisis, and additional funding for staffed beds.
Six governors also discussed supporting the behavioral health workforce through crosscutting investments. Massachusetts Gov. Baker discussed working with the legislature to address “enormous staff and clinician shortages in exactly the areas of care that we need most.” In Michigan, Gov. Whitmer stated, “40 percent of Michiganders do not get treatment for their mental illness. We will address this shortfall by expanding Michigan’s Loan Repayment Program for mental health professionals. And we will make a historic investment to retain and recruit hundreds more mental health workers.”
Broadband
This year, 17 governors discussed broadband in their state-of-the-state speeches, down from 30 in 2021. Governors in four states, Alabama, Delaware, Hawai’i and Maine proposed leveraging ARPA funding to support broadband efforts in their states. Other themes included broadband connectivity to support remote work and education and the creation of statewide authorities for broadband. Missouri Gov. Parson requested a “$34 million dollar investment in rural communities to increase access to telehealth and telemedicine services.”
Five governors identified broadband as critical for supporting remote work and education. According to Kansas Gov. Kelly, hotspots were deployed to students in low-income households to continue their education remotely. Gov. Dunleavy in Alaska stated that broadband “…unlocks the opportunity for us to live anywhere and work from anywhere in this Great State.”
Additionally, governors in Kansas and Maine are establishing statewide broadband authorities, In Kansas, the Office of Broadband Development has expanded internet access to over 50,000 new households and businesses. The Maine Connectivity Authority is “a new entity charged with achieving universal internet access.”
COVID-19
In 2021, 34 governors addressed COVID-19 in their state-of-the-state speeches, emphasizing vaccine distribution and economic recovery. In 2022, 17 governors mentioned COVID-19 with a focus on COVID-19 mandates, return to school, testing and vaccines.
The continued rollout of vaccines and testing as a strategy to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 were discussed by 12 governors. Gov. Sununu in New Hampshire emphasized the importance of data guiding the state’s approach. In South Dakota, Gov. Noem mentioned the state’s free at-home test program and announced an additional 1 million new tests to be delivered throughout the state.
Four governors spoke against COVID-19 mandates, including vaccines and masking. Gov. Dunleavy of Alaskastated his administration, “will continue to defend Alaskans’ rights to make their own medical decisions about vaccines and therapeutics for themselves and their families in consultation with their doctors and pharmacists.” Similarly, Gov. Parson of Missouri said, “when it comes to COVID-19 mandates, I firmly believe that the people should have say through their local elected representatives and not be dictated by needless executive action or any one person.”
Return to in-person instruction and masks in schools were discussed by three governors. Recently elected Gov. Youngkin of Virginia signed an executive order that allows parents to opt out of mask mandates in schools. In Kentucky, Gov. Beshear discussed the strategy to prioritize vaccines for educators and the state’s ability to return to in-person instruction in every school district early on.
Education
Thirty-seven governors discussed education this year and the impacts of COVID-19 were present throughout the speeches. Major themes included teacher recruitment and retention, addressing learning loss, and affordability of higher education. There was a marked decrease compared to last year in the number of governors that talked about expanding access to early education. Twenty-three governors proposed generalized investment in schools and students, and five governors emphasized the importance of keeping children in the classroom. Gov. Ige of Hawai’iemphasized the importance of in-person learning, but also announced the launch of the Hawai’i Virtual Learning Network—a virtual classroom network that can supplement in-person classes.
Eighteen governors talked about recruiting and retaining qualified teachers, with a major focus on increasing teacher salaries and recognizing the difficulties that educators have faced over the past two years. Gov. DeSantis of Florida proposed increases in teacher salaries in addition to $1000 bonuses for the second year in a row. Some governors also mentioned other types of support for teachers. For example, Gov. Hochul of New York proposed more “effective training and support, faster and easier certification, and stronger career pipelines and ladders”.
Sixteen governors proposed targeted investments in improving the quality of education in their states by enhancing literacy levels and meeting benchmarks, supporting greater investment in STEM education, or by making up learning loss sustained during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gov. Burgum of North Dakota talked about setting computer science and cyber science graduation standards for K-12 students, undergraduate students, and graduate students. Indiana Gov. Holcomb talked about the continued investment in accelerated learning programs to support students who fell behind during the pandemic.
Many governors also focused on opportunities following K-12 education, whether entering the workforce, enrolling at a community college, or attending a four-year university. Ten governors talked about apprenticeship programs and adult education opportunities, fourteen proposed investments in higher education, with nine of those focusing specifically on community college investments, and sixteen governors proposed higher education affordability measures like tuition freezes, scholarships, or loan forgiveness programs.
Ten governors also emphasized parental choices and roles in education, through vouchers, school choice programs, charter schools, or more parental involvement in curriculum. Idaho Gov. Little proposed an investment in Empowering Parents grants, which would cover “computers, tutoring, internet connectivity and other needs so students have the best chance for success.”
Equity
COVID-19 clearly shone a light on racial and ethnic health and economic-related disparities that existed prior to the pandemic, and in 2022, 9 governors highlighted the connection to equity in their plans, down from 21 governors in 2021. Three governors discussed the connection and disproportionate impact of the environment on low-income communities and communities of color. Oregon Gov. Brown used an equity lens to set the tone of her speech. She noted that she is “…most proud of is how Oregon approaches … challenges––through an equity lens. With a focus on our communities hardest hit by climate change: rural communities, people with low incomes, and people of color.”
Delaware Gov. Carney announced that the state, with federal support, will invest more than $400 million in Delaware’s clean water infrastructure, focusing on underserved communities. New York’s Gov. Hochul also proposed work to fix longstanding problems that disproportionately impact communities of color, including reconnecting neighborhoods that were cut off by highways, and directing the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) to conduct an environmental review, to ensure no further harm is done.
Three governors also considered the intersection of poverty and communities of color and developed strategies to mitigate economic impacts.
Health Care Costs
Seven governors addressed increasing health care costs— emphasizing the need to alleviate the burden of rising healthcare costs on both individuals and state budgets. Notable state efforts to lower costs across the health care system include:
– New Jersey Gov. Murphy committed to lowering healthcare and prescription drug costs through a cost growth benchmark and additional transparency requirements throughout the prescription drug supply chain to identify cost drivers.
– Nevada Gov. Sisolak announced that the state will join the Northwest Prescription Drug Consortium with Washington and Oregon to leverage collective purchasing power to lower the cost of prescription drugs.
– Gov. Cox of Utah asked legislators to support the newly established Utah Sustainable Health Collaborative tasked with developing strategies to lower health care costs while improving outcomes.
Virginia Gov. Youngkin expressed support for legislation to extend access to association health plans, providing small business owners with a lower cost coverage option for their employees. Three governors celebrated successful state reforms which have lowered health insurance costs in the individual and small group market.
– Colorado Gov. Polis shared that the state reinsurance program reduced healthcare premiums by 24 percent on the individual market, with even more significant cost savings in the western region of the state.
– Following last year’s launch of a state-based marketplace, New Jersey Gov. Murphy shared that enrollment in the individual marketplace increased by more than 25 percent.
– Nevada Gov. Sisolak touted last year’s adoption of a public option to increase affordability and expand coverage options.
Five governors addressed the issue of rising prescription drug costs, with the majority focusing on the prohibitively high cost of insulin. Governors in Michigan and Colorado aim to improve insulin affordability through monthly price caps and Gov. Whitmer of Michigan announced that the state’s Attorney General would launch an investigation into one of the largest producers of insulin for excessive pricing.
Health Care Workforce
This year, against the backdrop of ongoing COVID-19 hospitalizations and concerns about burnout, 20 governors talked about their plans to address workforce shortages and bolster the health care workforce. In 2021, only eight governors mentioned plans to support or bolster the healthcare workforce. Recruitment was the overarching theme this year, with fifteen governors talking about how to successfully train more nurses, doctors, or emergency responders, how to use scholarships or loan forgiveness programs to incentivize entry into the health care field, and how to bring more health care providers into the state from elsewhere. Governors of New York, South Dakota, and Vermont talked about recognizing out of state licenses to attract qualified providers to their states. In Alaska, Georgia, Hawai’i, Maine, New Mexico, and Oklahoma, governors talked about expanding education programs to train more nurses and other health care providers. These proposals included plans for adding faculty to existing programs, opening new educational programs, and admitting more students to increase the number of graduates. Gov. Reynolds of Iowa announced a new apprenticeship program for high school students that would allow them to become certified nursing assistants before graduating high school. And governors in Iowa, Illinois, Rhode Island,and New York mentioned plans to offer additional scholarships, tuition reimbursement, or loan forgiveness for students training to enter the health care workforce—particularly if they stay in-state after graduating.
In addition to recruitment, nine governors also focused on strategies to retain the existing workforce—particularly those individuals who are experiencing the exhaustion of the COVID-19 pandemic. In Alabama, Colorado, Maine, New York, and Wisconsin, governors talked about increased compensation for those in the healthcare field, through pay raises, higher Medicaid reimbursement rates, or bonuses. Gov. Polis of Colorado and Gov. Pritzker of Illinoismentioned plans to wave licensing fees for healthcare providers in their states.
Housing and Homelessness
Sixteen governors addressed housing and homelessness in their state of the state speeches. Highlighting the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, governors concentrated on the need to increase the supply of affordable housing, strategies to reduce homelessness, and rent and mortgage assistance. In her speech, Gov. Brown in Oregon made the connection between housing and homelessness stating, “there is no avoiding the fact that these two issues are undeniably linked –– a lack of affordable housing and some of the highest rates of people experiencing homelessness. In Oregon, today, missing one paycheck can be the difference between going to bed in a home with heat and running water, or sleeping unsheltered.”
Eleven governors spoke for the need to increase the housing stock with an emphasis on affordable housing. Gov. Mills of Maine referenced the Maine Jobs and Recovery Plan which will invest $50 million to “increase the number of energy-efficient, affordable homes for working Maine people.” In Colorado, Gov. Polis announced 14,000 units of affordable housing have been developed in the past year, saving families more than $72 million annually.
Governors in Delaware, New Mexico and Oregon discussed providing rent and mortgage assistance to residents, and governors in Colorado, Delaware and New Hampshire addressed using ARPA funding to support their housing programs. New Mexico Gov. Lujan Grisham said, “in the next 12 months your state government is going to deliver an additional $230 million in rent and utility assistance to the New Mexicans who need it most.”
In addition to increasing the housing supply, five governors discussed reducing homelessness in their states, proposing models such as permanent supportive housing. In Colorado, Gov. Polis proposed several interventions to address homelessness including “affordable and transitional housing, substance use treatment and recovery care, related residential programs, and permanent housing with wrap-around support services, and recipients of funds need to be held accountable for actually reducing homelessness.” Gov. Hochul of New York identified root causes of homelessness in her speech—poverty, addiction and housing insecurity—and announced a five-year housing plan to preserve 100,000 affordable homes with supportive services in 10,000 units.
Jobs/Livable Wages
The topic of employment, workforce investments, livable wages and the need to support overall economic growth was mentioned by a total of 38 governors, which is an increase from last year when 28 governors focused on this topic.
The most common theme was planned investments to promote workforce development through new training initiatives. Governors in Maine, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and Vermont specifically mentioned apprenticeship opportunities and career development for adolescents and young adults, and Vermont’s Gov. Scott placed an emphasis on trades training, in particular to help grow the number of nurses and other healthcare workers in the state. Oregon’s Gov. Brown discussed plans to build upon Future Ready Oregon, a workforce training initiative focused on jobs in health care, technology, manufacturing, and construction. She also mentioned plans to incorporate support services to help individuals advance from an entry-level job such as a certified nursing assistant to a health care administrator. Governors in Delaware, Michigan, Mississippi, and South Carolina shared plans to invest recently allocated federal funds to support workforce skills training initiatives, and Hawai’i’s Gov. Ige highlighted the launch of an online hub designed to connect unemployed individuals with career and training opportunities.
Governors also focused on the issue of supporting overall economic development. Delaware’s governor highlighted the state’s focus on championing small businesses to bolster job growth, including both “mom-and-pop” small businesses as well as cutting-edge technology companies, and Gov. Murphy of New Jersey commented similarly about supporting both technology start-ups and traditional small businesses. Other governors spoke about the role of planned tax cuts with the intention of supporting job creation, with governors in Colorado, Idaho, and Indiana mentioning this issue.
Some governors also focused on the issue of wages and highlighted plans to increase pay rates for state employees, such as law enforcement and teachers. The governors of Alabama, Kentucky and Missouri announced pay raises for all state workers, and Gov. McMaster commented that while overall compensation for South Carolina state employees should be reevaluated, salary increases should be determined by merit-based performance incentives rather than an across-the-board pay raise. Proposals to increase salaries for teachers specifically were raised by the governors in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Tennessee. Additionally, the governors of both Delaware and Pennsylvania advocated for an increase in the overall minimum wage in their states. Gov. Wolf noted that when factoring in inflation, minimum wage workers in Pennsylvania actually experienced a $2 pay reduction.
Medicaid, Coverage and Access
Despite the significant growth in state Medicaid programs during the pandemic, only five governors mentioned Medicaid in their speeches.
Several governors proposed Medicaid coverage and benefit expansions. In response to rising maternal mortality rates, governors in Georgia and Rhode Island advocated for extending postpartum Medicaid coverage from 60 days to 12 months to provide coverage continuity during the critical postpartum period. Rhode Island Gov. McKeeintroduced a proposal to cover all kids regardless of immigration status through the state’s Medicaid program. Tennessee Gov. Lee announced a $25 million dollar investment to broaden access to dental services for over 600,000 Medicaid recipients as well as an additional $55 million to support the Medicaid Pathways to Independence program.
Only Kansas Gov. Kelly advocated for adoption of Medicaid expansion, providing the economic argument that, “Medicaid expansion won’t just protect small towns and their residents, it will keep health care professionals from moving to neighboring states… (without Medicaid expansion) we are sabotaging our rural communities and their efforts to recruit new jobs and residents”.
The broader topic of health coverage and access was mentioned by governors in six states — a significant decline from last year when 17 governors addressed these issues. Governors were largely focused on the need to improve rural health care access:
– New Mexico Gov. Lujan Grisham proposed the creation of a Rural Health Care Delivery Fund to provide support for health systems in counties with fewer than 100,000 residents. The fund would provide financial support for newly constructed hospitals in rural areas to compensate for operating losses incurred during the first five years of operation.
– South Dakota Gov. Noem aims to improve health care options for rural communities by extending telehealth flexibilities to emergency responders.
– Wyoming Gov. Gordon committed to improving care accessibility through improvements to the state’s Emergency Medical System.
– Gov. Evers of Wisconsin will invest $20 million to provide rural communities with flexible funding to increase staffing support and provide additional training to first responders.
Gov. Pritzker of Illinois commented on the state’s recent $3.8 billion dollar investment in hospitals serving high proportions of Medicaid patients to improve care in underserved communities.
Other health-related issues
Below is a snapshot of some of the other health-related topics that governors mentioned:
- Aging: Four governors mentioned issues related to the elderly population in their speeches. Mills of Maine announced plans to establish a Silver Cabinet (similar to the state’s Children’s Cabinet) to promote interagency action on long-term care issues. New Mexico’s governor proposed an initiative called New Mexi-Care to expand an existing state program that supports and reimburses caregivers for the care they provide to elderly family members, regardless of Medicaid eligibility. Also, although New York’s Gov. Hochul did not mention the topic of aging in her speech, in an accompanying document she outlined intentions to develop a state master plan for aging.
- Child Care and Family Supports: Nine governors commented on proposals to support the needs of families, such as Delaware’s Gov. Carney advocating for paid leave in the private sector as well as other governors promoting increased access to high-quality and affordable child care. Maine’s Gov. Mills noted plans to include $12 million in the state’s supplemental budget to increase child care workers’ wages, and also highlighted the use of American Rescue Plan Act funds to strengthen the state’s child care system, which includes stipends for child care workers as well as investments in child care facilities and early childhood education programs. Iowa’s Gov. Reynolds announced an expansion of the state’s Childcare Challenge, which is designed to increase access to child care options for families, and commented on progress in implementing recommendations from the state’s Child Care Task Force. North Dakota’s Gov. Burgum highlighted a new initiative that will be launched in the spring to help employers offer child care benefits to their employees and a soon-to-be finalized comprehensive state strategy for increasing access to high-quality, affordable child care. Utah’s Gov. Cox proposed creating a new government position to address the needs of parents and children, which will focus on parental leave, increased access to child care, and mentoring opportunities for parents. Also, Tennessee’s Gov. Lee highlighted recent funding for the state’s Healthy Starts Initiative, which focuses on maternal health and holistic care for both mothers and children.
- Child Welfare: Eight governors spoke about the child welfare system, including the governors of Arizona, Florida, Georgia, and Tennessee who mentioned potential new investments to support caregivers. Ducey in Arizona mentioned plans to provide resources to extended family members caring for children who would otherwise be in the foster care system, and Georgia’s governor proposed a 10 percent provider rate increase for all foster parents, relative caregivers, and child caring and placing agencies. In Washington, Gov. Inslee said that his budget would include $80 million to support foster care youth with complex needs and help them transition out of foster care. Gov. Kelly noted that Kansas was one of the first states to implement the Family First Prevention Services Act and the recent creation of the Division of the Child Advocate to help ensure that youth in the child welfare system are healthier and safer.
- Environmental Actions: Seventeen governors discussed their plans to protect the environment, including plans to address climate resiliency and ensuring clean air and water for residents. Ten governors discussed plans to improve water quality. Kansas shared the state’s new water plan, a five-year blueprint to ensure the state has a reliable, quality water supply to support the needs of Kansas communities, including their farming economy. Ten governors discussed their plans to address climate change and promote climate resiliency. Delaware’ Gov. Carney announced the state’s new Climate Action Plan. Six governors discussed actions to reduce carbon emissions or become carbon neutral, and four governors noted deadlines by which this must occur. Ige reflected that Hawai’i was the first state to commit to a net-negative goal by 2045 and re-committed to doubling down on this effort.
- Food Access: Eight governors commented on the issue of food security, distribution, and production. Alaska’s Gov. Dunleavy spoke about plans to create a Food Security Task Force to help promote the state’s agriculture and mariculture industries and minimize disruptions in the food supply chain by supporting state-grown products. In response to rising food costs, governors in both Illinois and Kansas advocated that their state’s grocery taxes should be suspended, and Utah’s governor proposed a $160 million grocery tax credit for families. Maine’s Gov. Mills announced that her proposed budget will include plans to fund universal free meals in schools and promote school and community gardens.
- Public Health: Three governors addressed the topic of public health, with the governor of Indiana mentioning a number of public health issues, including that the state’s Public Health Commission will be publishing recommendations on ways to modernize and strengthen the state’s overall public health system. Also, given that the state ranks 46th in obesity, 46th in smoking, and 40th in childhood immunizations, he emphasized the importance of investing in preventive measures to minimize future costly health complications. Additionally, he noted plans to continue focusing on reducing infant mortality and strengthening childhood lead screening efforts. Nebraska’s Gov. Ricketts highlighted plans to use $200 million from the American Rescue Plan Act for public health emergency response efforts. South Carolina’s governor also noted plans to use federal funds for investments in upgrading water and sewer systems and commented on how these enhancements can improve the overall public health of communities.
- Transportation: Seven governors spoke about transportation infrastructure investments from a health-focused perspective. Five governors mentioned initiatives to support clean transportation, with Delaware’s Gov. Carney and Michigan’s Gov. Whitmer highlighting plans to dedicate resources to support electric vehicles and Washington’s Gov. Inslee proposing to invest nearly $1 billion to fund a range of transportation programs that reduce pollution. Additionally, Indiana’s Gov. Holcomb spoke about investing in commuter rail projects as well as committing $150 million to expand the state’s walking, hiking, and biking trails.
- Violence Prevention: Thirteen governors commented on the issue of violence prevention. The governors of Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York emphasized the importance of gun violence prevention, and the governors of both Colorado and Illinois focused on community-based violence prevention initiatives. Alaska’s Gov. Dunleavy requested state legislators to fund the People First Initiative, which includes addressing the issues of domestic violence and sexual assault, human trafficking, and missing and murdered Indigenous individuals.
Conclusion
As the United States enters the third year of the pandemic, governors’ 2022 state-of-the-state speeches reflect the realities of health and economic recovery. Compared to 2021, states have access to additional resources through ARPA, and their priorities remain centered on addressing the lasting impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic with an emphasis on behavioral health, education and jobs and wages. As state legislatures convene and enact budgets, the National Academy for State Health Policy will continue to track many of these topics in the coming months.
Webinar: State Strategies to Support Telehealth Infrastructure
/in Policy Webinars Behavioral/Mental Health and SUD, COVID-19 /by NASHP StaffMoving Toward Prevention: Oregon Launches Kindergarten Readiness Metric
/in Behavioral/Mental Health and SUD, Policy Oregon Blogs, Featured News Home Back to School, Behavioral/Mental Health and SUD, COVID-19, Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health, Relief and Recovery /by Elinor HigginsOregon has launched a new kindergarten readiness metric in its Medicaid program. Early childhood is a critical time for growth and development, and the services and supports children and their families receive early on can have a large impact on health outcomes later in life. Because COVID-19 has exacerbated existing health disparities, including for young children, state officials are looking for new ways to support healthy child development and advance health equity. Oregon has promoted healthy child development for decades, with a particular focus on the social-emotional health of young children. The state’s new kindergarten readiness incentive metric focused on social-emotional health renews that commitment and helps solidify the connection between a child’s health and their success in school and beyond.
In the 2000s, Oregon worked with the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) in the Assuring Better Child Health and Development (ABCD) Program. One of the state’s major goals at the time was to increase developmental screening for young children. One of the levers Oregon used to achieve this goal was to include developmental screening as an incentive measure for coordinated care organizations (CCOs)—a successful approach that led to one of the best developmental screening rates in the country. At that time, there was also interest in outcome-based kindergarten readiness metrics and a sense that CCOs could help ensure that children have their health-related needs met before entering the school system. NASHP staff recently interviewed state officials in Oregon about how the state has progressed from incentivizing developmental screening to creating a kindergarten readiness incentive measure that prioritizes children’s social-emotional health.
Kindergarten Readiness and Social-Emotional Health
For many children, kindergarten is their first contact with the education system. Those who arrive in the classroom with the skills and supports they need are more likely to have a positive experience, to succeed in school, and to have a healthy life. With the leadership of the Children’s Institute in collaboration with the Oregon Health Authority and Oregon Pediatric Improvement Partnership, Oregon formed the Health Aspects of Kindergarten Readiness Technical Workgroup in 2018 to identify the health aspects of kindergarten readiness and to offer recommendations about how to measure them. The workgroup, which was made up of pediatricians, early learning partners, families, and others, identified physical, oral, developmental, and social-emotional health as key aspects of kindergarten readiness in a 2019 report. The workgroup identified a need for systems-level change with social-emotional health as a priority focus area.
In conversations with NASHP, stakeholders in Oregon described unidentified or untreated social-emotional health delays as a factor that contributes to long-term educational inequities by increasing both the likelihood of classroom behaviors that are viewed as difficult and the likelihood of disciplinary action. Additionally, national data shows that children of color, particularly those who are Black or Indigenous, are more likely to have one or more adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) than white children—which can negatively impact social-emotional development. An Oregon health official shared that when children have ACEs and also experience racism, the supports available are often not matched to cultural needs and the response to social-emotional delays can further perpetuate health inequities.
In Oregon, children with social-emotional delays are not as likely to receive follow-up care as children who screen positive for other health needs. The Oregon Pediatric Improvement Partnership (OPIP) has led improvement work in 13 counties to focus on follow-up to developmental screening and consistently found that children with social-emotional delays rarely received follow-up services and a contributing factor is the lack of services available for children birth to age five.
Development of a CCO Incentive Measure for Kindergarten Readiness
In Oregon, the Medicaid CCOs, the state’s version of an “accountable care organization,” share financial and medical responsibility for physical, behavioral, and oral care with the state for providing coordinated care in order to limit unnecessary spending. The Oregon Health Authority (OHA) provides CCOs with a fixed global budget that allows them the flexibility to implement new ways of paying for and delivering care, using strategies that are best suited for their members. In addition to standard performance measures, a set of incentive measures is linked to a CCO quality pool fund. CCOs must meet benchmarks for performance on these measures to be eligible for incentive payments from the quality pool.
The Health Aspects of Kindergarten Readiness Technical Workgroup was tasked with identifying and assessing existing kindergarten readiness metrics to identify gaps and ultimately recommending metrics that could address health and be part of the CCO incentive measure set. After the 2019 measure recommendations were unanimously endorsed by state measurement committees, in 2020, Oregon began implementing readily available incentive metrics for children’s preventive dental and well-child visits. Then, informed in part by the OPIP pilot programs and the lack of services to address children’s social-emotional needs, the group recommended that CCOs work to incorporate a child-focused social-emotional kindergarten readiness incentive metric. The group recommended a strategy for building capacity to provide follow-up services and care: the suggested incentive measure would first require CCOs to do the community outreach and planning to develop needed resources and strengthen connections to services.
A team made up of individuals from the Children’s Institute and OPIP developed the novel metric, which was supported by the Oregon Health Authority. The team presented a proposal to Oregon’s Metrics and Scoring Committee in November 2020 and then carried out pilot activities with the CCOs in early 2021. The resulting Health Aspects of Kindergarten Readiness Measure: System-Level Social-Emotional Health Metric was endorsed a metric and is included in the 2022 incentive measure set. As the CCO Metrics 2020 Final Report shows, distribution of quality pool funds is based on the number of total incentive measures a CCO meets and the CCO’s size.
Implementation and Next Steps
The kindergarten readiness metric is transformative and anchored to community engagement, stakeholder input, and hearing from marginalized communities in order for the CCO to attest to completing specific activities. Over the four years that the system-level incentive metric is in place, the CCOs will be asked to complete activities that fall into four specific components that require:
- Social-Emotional Health Reach Metric Data Review and Assessment
- Development of an Asset Map of Existing Social-Emotional Health Services and Resources
- CCO-Led Cross-Sector Community Engagement
- Development of an Action Plan to Improve Social-Emotional Health Service Capacity and Access
The CCOs will engage communities, create asset maps to identify what services are available, and review data for populations with historical inequities—breaking out the data by ACEs, medical complexities, race and ethnicity, zip codes, and more. At the end of the first year, the CCOs will design an action plan with community input about where to focus improvements. Over the remaining years the CCOs will continue to track and analyze the data to identify barriers and facilitators and to inform the transition to a child-focused social-emotional kindergarten readiness incentive metric at the end of the fourth year.
A key focus is assessing how the data, asset map, community engagement, and action plans can be informed by and address the specific needs of historically marginalized populations. Oregon has adopted the strategic goal to end health inequities in the state of Oregon by 2030. Implementing strategies among young children that promote health equity and equitable educational achievement is one way that Oregon is working toward a more equitable future for all inhabitants. As children’s health, mental health, and development opportunities continue to be a primary focus of COVID-19 recovery efforts, incentive-based approaches hold great promise to eliminate disparities experienced by children from historically marginalized communities.
States Take Action to Address Children’s Mental Health in Schools
/in COVID-19 Relief and Recovery Resource Center Blogs, Featured News Home Back to School, Behavioral/Mental Health and SUD, COVID-19 /by Olivia Randi and Zack GouldThe COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated rising mental health needs among children and youth. In addition to experiencing the human cost and social isolation brought upon by COVID-19, many children have lacked consistent time in classrooms. School closures and shifts to online learning have limited access to educational and social opportunities as well as mental health services. Since the onset of the pandemic, 38 states have enacted nearly 100 laws focused on supporting schools in their role as one of the primary access points for pediatric behavioral health care. These laws provide funding for school-based mental health services, strategic planning to improve school mental health systems, training and resources for school staff and students, and guidance for school policies. As children navigate the lasting impacts of the pandemic and policymakers prioritize youth mental health, states are certain to continue investing in and strengthening school-based mental health systems.
Background
In 2019, 16.5 percent of US children were estimated to have at least one mental health disorder, and the rates of adolescents who experienced persistent sadness or considered suicide both rose substantially from 10 years prior. The COVID-19 pandemic has only amplified these decade-long trends. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported sharp increases in the proportion of children’s emergency department visits that are related to mental health. At the same time, youth utilization of mental health services has decreased, which may reflect families’ concerns in seeking non-emergency, in-person care given the risk of COVID-19 and shortages of available health care professionals working in children’s mental health.
The Biden Administration and key national organizations representing providers have intensified their focus on children’s behavioral health. In December 2021, U.S. Surgeon General Vivek H. Murthy issued a youth mental health advisory and released guidance for states in elevating policies to improve children’s behavioral health. The advisory included allocating more resources and technical assistance to school mental health systems as a key recommendation for state officials. In addition, in October 2021, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and Children’s Hospital Association released a joint statement declaring a national emergency of child and adolescent mental health, calling upon federal and state policymakers to address key priorities for improving the state of children’s mental health.
School-based mental health care can improve access to mental health services, reduce risk, and improve mental health and academic outcomes for students. Additionally, when effectively designed, school mental health services may help to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in access to mental health care. Ideally, these services are delivered through a comprehensive school mental health system (CSMHS) which supportsprevention, early identification, and provision of services and treatment for students with mental health needs. These systems are increasingly important to help address children’s mental health needs, particularly during the pandemic.
Federal initiatives that support CSMHSs include the Health Resources & Services Administration’s School-Based Health Centers, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) Project Advancing Wellness and Resilience in Education (AWARE), and the Department of Education’s School-Based Mental Health Services Grant Program. Additionally, SAMHSA and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have developed joint guidance to support states in implementing effective payment and delivery models for school-based behavioral health services.
State Laws Enacted During the Pandemic to Support School Mental Health Systems
Based on a national scan of state legislation introduced during the pandemic (March 2020 to December 2021), NASHP identified 92 state laws that were enacted to support children’s mental health through schools. States have pursued a range of approaches including 26 states allocating federal and state funding to increase school-based mental health services, 12 states supporting strategic planning to improve school mental health systems, 24 states providing education and resources for school staff and students, and 10 states guiding school mental health policies. See the table below for a list of states that have enacted laws to support these strategies.
Supporting strategic planning to improve school mental health systems
Schools often face a range of challenges in supporting students’ mental health, including identifying and implementing best practices and coordinating across agencies. During the pandemic, 12 states enacted laws that support strategic planning to identify barriers and approaches to increase access to school-based mental health services.
- Arkansas’s HB 1689 (Act 802) established the Arkansas Legislative Study on Mental Health and Behavioral Health, which is required to study and develop a report on mental health screening and suicide prevention policies for children in schools. (Enacted October 1, 2021)
- Connecticut’s HB 6621 (Public Act No. 21-95) established requirements for the School Emotional Learning and School Climate Advisory Collaborative, which will develop a strategy to initiate collaborations with community-based mental health providers and support school staff in mental health and social-emotional learning. (Enacted June 24, 2021)
Allocating funding to increase school-based mental health services
Schools report that the most common limitation to providing mental health services for students is inadequate funding. Relatedly, many schools face challenges in engaging mental health providers, and few meet the recommended ratios of students to counselors, psychologists, and social workers. To alleviate this barrier, 26 states enacted laws to increase financial support for school-based mental health services. These measures include funding to reimburse and support school telemental health services and to hire school-based mental health providers.
- California’s AB 133 (Chapter 143) established the Children’s Behavioral Health Initiative, which includes grant funding for school-linked behavioral health services. (Enacted July 27, 2021)
- Massachusetts’ H 4002 (Chapter 24) appropriated funding for a pilot program for telebehavioral health services through schools. (Enacted July 29, 2021)
- North Carolina’s SB 105 (SL 2021-180) allocated funding from the American Rescue Plan Act to establish a grant program for schools to hire psychologists in response to COVID-19. (Enacted November 18, 2021)
Providing mental health education and resources for school staff and students
Teachers and school staff can often be more effective in supporting students’ mental health when equipped with information on mental health and best practices for prevention and early identification. Seventeen states enacted laws to provide mental health training and resources for school staff.
- Rhode Island’s SB 31/HB 5353 (Chapter 131) requires that school staff and students receive education on suicide awareness and prevention. (Enacted April 22, 2021)
- Virginia’s SB 1288/2299 (Chapter 452) requires that school counselors receive training in mental health, including mental health disorders, depression, trauma, and youth suicide, in order to be licensed and to renew their license. (Enacted March 30, 2021)
States have also supported schools in providing mental health education and resources directly to students and their families. Thirteen states enacted laws to support schools in providing mental health education and resources for students.
- Illinois’ SB 818 (Public Act 102-0522) requires that health education courses for students include information on mental health. (Enacted August 21, 2021) Illinois also adopted HJR 1, which encourages schools to provide mental health training and education for students. (Adopted June 1, 2021)
- Texas’ SB 279 requires schools to include crisis line contact information on all identification cards for students in grades six through twelve. (Enacted May 28, 2021)
- Washington’s HB 1373 (Chapter 167) requires all school websites to provide access to information and resources on behavioral health, including mental health. (Enacted May 3, 2021)
Guiding school mental health policies
While local school districts often have autonomy in implementing and administering policies and programs, states can provide guidance for these policies by issuing requirements and recommendations. Ten states have enacted laws to support schools in adopting innovative policies to address many of the unmet needs and gaps in youth mental health services exposed during the pandemic. These include requiring that schools allow mental health days or excused absences related to students’ mental health needs, delineate protocols around providing mental health services, and develop plans for responding to a student experiencing a mental health crisis.
- Connecticut’s SB 2 (Public Act No. 21-46) requires local boards of education to allow students to take up to four mental health days per school year. (Enacted June 16, 2021)
- Florida’s SB 590 (Chapter 2021-176) requires that school health services plans, which are jointly developed by county health departments and local school boards, indicate that school and law enforcement staff must attempt to contact a mental health professional for a student in crisis, and that behavioral health providers and school resource officers must attempt to verbally de-escalate crises. (Enacted July 6, 2021)
Conclusion
Children’s mental health has been and will continue to be a top priority for state leaders across both legislative and executive branches of state government. With COVID-19 exacerbating the challenges children are facing, there is much more work to be done. This blog summarizes the actions many states have taken from March 2020 through December 2021. However, many more states continue to consider legislation during the 2022 session. The National Academy for State Health Policy will continue to track state policies to support children’s mental health during and beyond the pandemic.
Summary of State Laws Enacted During the COVID-19 Pandemic to Support School Mental Health Systems (March 2020-December 2021)
| Approach | States |
| Supporting strategic planning | |
| Work group/task force | AR, CA, CT, HI, MA, MI, TX, VA |
| Data/assessment of needs | AR, CA, CT, MN, TX |
| Recommendations and standards | AK, CA, CT, HI, LA, ME, VA |
| Allocating funding to support school-based mental health services | |
| Mental health services* | AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, IN, KS, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MT, ND, NJ, NY, OH, OR, PA, TN, VA, WA |
| Telemental health | CO, FL, IL, MA, MN |
| Providers | AZ, DE, KY, MI, NC |
| Providing mental health education and resources | |
| School staff | AK, AR, CA, CO, DC, IL, IN, KY, LA, MA, MN, ND, NY, OK, OR, RI, VA |
| Students** | CA, CT, IL, KY, RI, UT, WA |
| Crisis hotline printed on student IDs | AR, IL, IN, NJ, NV, SC, TX |
| Guiding school mental health policies | |
| Mental health days/excused absence | AZ, CA, CT, IL, NV, UT |
| Crisis response policies | FL, MA, NE, NV, OR |
Note: The states listed here have enacted laws during the COVID-19 pandemic that support these approaches. These laws may be sustaining existing programs/policies, or enacting new ones, and states may vary in their implementation progress. Other state laws may have been enacted that support school-based mental health, but the language of the act did not specify as such. Additionally, other states may have implemented these approaches through other policy mechanisms.
*This category does not include state laws that specifically fund telemental health services (these laws are included separately in the row below).
**This category does not include state laws that require crisis hotlines to be printed on student IDs (these laws are included separately in the row below).
Community Health Workers Twitter Chat — Thursday, February 24
/in Community Health Workers Featured News Home Community Health Workers, Population Health /by NASHP StaffThe National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) is hosting a Twitter chat on Thursday, February 24th at noon ET to continue the conversation around states’ best practices for sustainably financing the community health worker (CHW) workforce, and strategies to partner with these essential workers throughout and beyond the pandemic.
To join the conversation, make sure you follow @NASHPhealth on Twitter and use the hashtag #CHWChat.
How to Participate
- Follow @NASHPhealth on Twitter.
- Join us on February 24th at noon EST and follow the conversation using #CHWtalk.
- Share your thoughts and ideas on policies and support resources.
- Use links to your website, programs, initiatives, and partners in your tweets to promote the good work you, your organization, and/or state are doing!
- Include #CHWtalk in all of your tweets so chat participants can easily follow you and others during this event.
How it Works
- Each question will be numbered Q1, Q2, Q3, etc.
- Start your responses with A1, A2, A3 etc. to correspond with the question.
- You only have 280 characters per tweet but you’re not limited to only one tweet per question. Use A1a, A1b, A1c, etc. to indicate either a multi-part answer or multiple responses to a given question.
The Questions
- Q1. What role have CHWs played during the pandemic?
- Q2. How do CHWs help increase access to public health / health care for historically marginalized populations?
- Q3. What are some innovative ways that CHWs work in the community to promote community health?
- Q4. How can CHWs collaborate with other stakeholders to address social determinants of health and reduce health disparities?
- Q5. How does your state or community work to support CHWs as a workforce?
- Q6. What steps are states and communities taking to ensure that CHWs are sustainably financed and paid livable wages?
- Q7. What are some creative efforts at the state, local, and community level to support CHWs?
- Q8. What work can be done at the federal level to support CHWs?
- Q9. What’s your #1 tip for state officials that want to support CHWs?
This chat is an excellent opportunity to highlight some of your exciting initiatives, innovations, and resources!
For questions, please contact Rebecca Cooper at rcooper@oldsite.nashp.org.
NASHP’s Expanding Emerging Leaders of Color Fellowship
/in Health Equity Blogs, Featured News Home Equity, Health Equity /by Hemi TewarsonI am excited to welcome applications for the second year of NASHP’s Emerging Leaders of Color (ELC) Fellowship Program. NASHP is committed to addressing equity in our work across states and the ELC Fellowship is central to this commitment. We are looking for those who are inspired to learn more about state health policy and to work with us to ensure that our state governments can better reflect the communities that they serve.
In late 2020, NASHP launched the ELC Fellowship to help improve the accessibility of state health policy careers for people of color, particularly those from communities most impacted by health disparities.
Applications are due by 11:59 p.m. ET on Feb. 15, 2022. View more information here.
Through the ELC fellowship, NASHP equips emerging and aspiring state health policy leaders of color with the tools to enter state government and lead the development and administration of more equitable policy informed by their own lived experiences. These tools include guided learning opportunities and hands-on experiences as well as a community to share support and educational/ professional opportunities.
Central to this experience is the pairing of each fellow with a current state leader of color who can help them learn about, and navigate, the realm of state policy.
Last year, we were so pleased to have three fellows. The inaugural cohort of ELC Fellows meaningfully contributed to a diverse array of projects, particularly with health equity implications, alongside their state advisors, including:
- Aligning early childhood health and Medicaid
- Improving Medicaid coverage of fertility preservation services
- Designing departmental diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts
- Developing an agency health equity strategy
- Implementing Medicaid coverage of doulas
- Increasing follow-up for postpartum care
- Improving provider and member messaging for contraceptive care
Given the success of last year’s program, this year NASHP is expanding the ELC Fellowship to accept up to ten fellows and each fellow will receive a stipend of $6,300. Fellows will be partnered with a state leader of color to take on a project of mutual interest. Fellows will also have the opportunity to engage in NASHP’s ongoing work, including a visit to Washington, DC and attending NASHP’s annual conference in Seattle, Washington.
The NASHP staff, corporate board and Academy members are looking forward to the launch of this year’s ELC Fellowship. I know we will have another impressive class of fellows this year and we are all excited to partner with them. We will announce the 2022 class of fellows by April 12, 2022.
2021 COVID-19 State Restrictions, Re-openings, and Mask Requirements
/in COVID-19 State Action Center COVID-19, Health Equity, Population Health, Social Determinants of Health /by NASHP StaffState Strategies to Improve HPV Vaccine Uptake in Pre-Teens and Adolescents
/in COVID-19 Relief and Recovery Resource Center Featured News Home, Reports Vaccines /by Rebecca Cooper, Ella Roth and Sandra WilknissNASHP’s Emerging Leaders of Color Fellowship Information and Application
/in Policy Blogs, Featured News Home Health Equity, Population Health, Social Determinants of Health /by NASHP StaffNew Application Coming Soon
To help shape more equitable systems and policies, NASHP’s Emerging Leaders of Color Fellowship aims to empower emerging state health policy leaders from communities of color to lead the development and administration of state health policy informed by their lived experiences. NASHP connects ELC Fellows with a community of support, guided learning opportunities, and hands-on experience in state government.
Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter
Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter
Washington, DC Office:
1233 20th St., N.W., Suite 303Washington, DC 20036
p: (202) 903-0101
f: (202) 903-2790
Contact Us
Phone: 202-903-0101


For individuals living with complex, often chronic conditions, and their families, palliative care can provide relief from symptoms, improve satisfaction and outcomes, and help address critical mental and spiritual needs during difficult times. Now more than ever, there is growing recognition of the importance of palliative care services for individuals with serious illness, such as advance care planning, pain and symptom management, care coordination, and team-based, multi-disciplinary support. These services can help patients and families cope with the symptoms and stressors of disease, better anticipate and avoid crises, and reduce unnecessary and/or unwanted care. While this model is grounded in evidence that demonstrates improved quality of life, better outcomes, and reduced cost for patients, only a fraction of individuals who could benefit from palliative care receive it. 























































































































































