Webinar: State Strategies to Support Telehealth Infrastructure
/in Policy Webinars Behavioral/Mental Health and SUD, COVID-19 /by NASHP StaffWebinar: A Discussion with States on Medicaid Unwinding
/in Policy Webinars Eligibility and Enrollment, Health Coverage and Access /by NASHP StaffWebinar: Building a Continuum of Care for People with Serious Illness: State Strategies to Support Patient Engagement
/in Policy Webinars Chronic and Complex Populations, Palliative Care /by NASHP StaffState Policies to Strengthen the Direct Care Workforce
/in The RAISE Act Family Caregiver Resource and Dissemination Center Webinars The RAISE Family Caregiver Resource and Dissemination Center /by NASHP StaffChildren and COVID-19: Strategies and Partnerships for Vaccination
/in Policy Webinars COVID-19, Relief and Recovery, Vaccines /by NASHP StaffState-Only Webinar: State Strategies for Insulin Affordability and Access
/in Policy Webinars /by NASHP StaffStrategies to Increase COVID-19 Vaccination Rates in Medicaid Enrollees: Considerations for State Leaders
/in Policy Webinars COVID-19, Relief and Recovery, Vaccines /by NASHP StaffEnd of Life Planning: Best Practices in Using POLST
/in Palliative Care Webinars Palliative Care /by NASHP StaffOctober 21, 2021 3 p.m. ET
The POLST form is a portable medical order that communicates treatment goals and preferences for people with serious illness or advanced frailty. POLST is implemented at the state level, and some states use other terms such as MOLST for its Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment. Listen to this webinar to learn the latest about national and state POLST practices.
Speakers:
- Rani Snyder, Vice President, Program, The John A. Hartford Foundation
- Amy Vandenbroucke, JD, Executive Director, National POLST
- Delegate Danielle Walker, West Virginia House of Delegates
- Danielle Funk, Program Manager, West Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care
- Cindy Munn, Chief Executive Officer, Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum
State-Only Webinar: The Impact of Rutledge on State PBM Regulation and Beyond
/in Policy Webinars /by NASHP Staff2–3pm (ET) Thursday, October 28, 2021
The US Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA) was a victory for states. The ruling affirmed that states can regulate pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) despite PCMA’s assertion that the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) preempted such regulation. The Rutledge ruling thereby extended the reach of state PBM regulation to include PBM’s serving self-funded plans, otherwise regulated by federal law through ERISA. PBM regulation is already the most common form of drug pricing-related legislation in state legislatures, and the Rutledge ruling has fueled continue interest in this area. Attendees to this “safe harbor” state-only webinar learned:
- How Rutledge has impacted state regulation of PBMs;
- The impact of Rutledge beyond PBM regulation, including broader state health care cost regulation;
- How states have reacted to Rutledge.
Moderator: Jennifer Reck, MA, Project Director, Center for Drug Pricing, National Academy for State Health Policy
Speakers:
- Erin C. Fuse Brown, JD, MPH, Catherine C. Henson Professor of Law & Director of the Center for Law, Health & Society, Georgia State University College of Law
- Booth Rand, JD, Managing Counsel, Arkansas Insurance Department
- David Cooney, FLMI, AIRC, Associate Commissioner, Life and Health, Maryland Insurance Administration
Background Resources:
- Erin C. Fuse Brown and Elizabeth Y. McCuskey, Health Affairs Blog (Dec. 2020), The Implications Of Rutledge v. PCMA For State Health Care Cost Regulation.
- Jennifer Reck and Trish Riley, NASHP Blog (Dec. 2020) In Major Victory for States, Supreme Court Clears the Way for State Health Reform.
Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter
Sign Up for Our Weekly Newsletter
Washington, DC Office:
1233 20th St., N.W., Suite 303Washington, DC 20036
p: (202) 903-0101
f: (202) 903-2790
Contact Us
Phone: 202-903-0101

For individuals living with complex, often chronic conditions, and their families, palliative care can provide relief from symptoms, improve satisfaction and outcomes, and help address critical mental and spiritual needs during difficult times. Now more than ever, there is growing recognition of the importance of palliative care services for individuals with serious illness, such as advance care planning, pain and symptom management, care coordination, and team-based, multi-disciplinary support. These services can help patients and families cope with the symptoms and stressors of disease, better anticipate and avoid crises, and reduce unnecessary and/or unwanted care. While this model is grounded in evidence that demonstrates improved quality of life, better outcomes, and reduced cost for patients, only a fraction of individuals who could benefit from palliative care receive it. 























































































































































