Value-Based Purchasing
FEATURED ARTICLE
Conference Presentations 2015
/in Policy Annual Conference Behavioral/Mental Health and SUD, Care Coordination, Children/Youth with Special Health Care Needs, Chronic and Complex Populations, Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health System Costs, Medicaid Managed Care, Medicaid Managed Care, Palliative Care, Physical and Behavioral Health Integration, Primary Care/Patient-Centered/Health Home, Quality and Measurement, Value-Based Purchasing /by NASHPPreconference First Name Last Name Presentation Finding Shared Solutions Across Mental Health, Substance Use Disorders, and Medicaid to Promote Recovery Tamara Sale Sale.precon.prevention.pdf Finding Shared Solutions Across Mental Health, Substance Use Disorders, and Medicaid to Promote Recovery Tom Betlach Betlach.precon.health reform.pdf Finding Shared Solutions Across Mental Health, Substance Use Disorders, and Medicaid to Promote Recovery […]
Beyond Medicaid: Critical Roles for Public Health, Insurance, and States in Fostering Multi-Payer Payment Reform
/in Policy Webinars Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health System Costs, Medicaid Managed Care, Quality and Measurement, Value-Based Purchasing /by NASHPOregon’s Bridge to Value-Based Payments for Community Health Centers: A Win for Medicaid, Providers, & Patients
/in Policy Oregon Blogs Accountable Health, Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health Equity, Health System Costs, Medicaid Managed Care, Population Health, Primary Care/Patient-Centered/Health Home, Quality and Measurement, Social Determinants of Health, Value-Based Purchasing /by Mary Takach and Ledia TaborStates are developing new ways to pay Medicaid providers based on quality and efficiency over number of visits. However, these payment options can present challenges for states in integrating safety net providers into their efforts. In Oregon, Medicaid and the state’s Primary Care Association (PCA) have embarked on an alternative payment model that is breaking […]
Health Reform Hub Maps and Charts
/in Policy Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health System Costs, Medicaid Managed Care, Quality and Measurement, Value-Based Purchasing /by NASHP WritersHealth Reform Hub Blog Posts
/in Policy Blogs Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health System Costs, Medicaid Managed Care, Primary Care/Patient-Centered/Health Home, Quality and Measurement, Value-Based Purchasing /by NASHP WritersFive Strategies for More Effective Assessments of State Demonstrations
/in Policy Blogs Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health System Costs, Medicaid Managed Care, Primary Care/Patient-Centered/Health Home, Quality and Measurement, Value-Based Purchasing /by Policy AssociateWhat are state and federal policymakers looking for when they invest[i] in state health care demonstration projects? Results. Policymakers need evaluation data to justify investments to legislators and other stakeholders, and to accurately assess the effectiveness of the demonstrations. However, gauging the impact of state demonstrations through monitoring and evaluation requires a great deal of […]
Determining the Impact of State Demonstrations: Considerations for State and Federal Policymakers
/in Policy Texas Reports Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health System Costs, Medicaid Managed Care, Primary Care/Patient-Centered/Health Home, Quality and Measurement, Value-Based Purchasing /by NASHPStates and the federal government are investing heavily in state demonstrations to reform the health care delivery system, and policymakers need data to assess the demonstrations’ effectiveness and justify these investments to state legislators, Congress, and other stakeholders. Gauging the impact of state demonstrations through monitoring and evaluation requires time and effort from both state and […]
Vermont Gets its Day in Court on ERISA: Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Next Term
/in Policy Vermont Blogs Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health Coverage and Access, Health IT/Data, Health System Costs, Quality and Measurement, Value-Based Purchasing /by NASHP and Alice WeissThe Supreme Court granted certiorari in Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual, a case brought by Vermont challenging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling on ERISA preemption that bars the state from requiring self-insured employer-sponsored health plans to submit claims data to Vermont’s all-payer claims database (APCD). In doing so, the Supreme Court is providing Vermont […]
Payment Reform
/in Policy Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health System Costs, Medicaid Managed Care, Quality and Measurement, Value-Based Purchasing /by NASHPMany states are developing and implementing payment reform initiatives to help improve the patient experience and the health of populations while lowering the costs of care. Payment reform efforts involve a transition away from fee-for-service (FFS) payment mechanisms that reward high volume to alternative payment methods that reward value. Such payment models include shared savings, […]
HCCI and NASHP Announce State Health Policy Grant Recipients
/in Policy Blogs Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health System Costs, Medicaid Managed Care, Quality and Measurement, Value-Based Purchasing /by NASHPFor Immediate Release: March 5, 2015 Contact: For HCCI: Maya Brod, 301-280-5757 mbrod@burness.com For NASHP: Lesa Rair, 202-903-2785 lrair@oldsite.nashp.org Research teams will analyze how states are implementing health system reforms The Health Care Cost Institute (HCCI) and the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) have announced the recipients of the State Health Policy Grant […]

For individuals living with complex, often chronic conditions, and their families, palliative care can provide relief from symptoms, improve satisfaction and outcomes, and help address critical mental and spiritual needs during difficult times. Now more than ever, there is growing recognition of the importance of palliative care services for individuals with serious illness, such as advance care planning, pain and symptom management, care coordination, and team-based, multi-disciplinary support. These services can help patients and families cope with the symptoms and stressors of disease, better anticipate and avoid crises, and reduce unnecessary and/or unwanted care. While this model is grounded in evidence that demonstrates improved quality of life, better outcomes, and reduced cost for patients, only a fraction of individuals who could benefit from palliative care receive it. 
























































































































































Independent Analysis Finds Montana Has Saved Millions by Moving Hospital Rate Negotiations to Reference-Based Pricing
/in Policy Montana Blogs, Featured News Home Consumer Affordability, Cost, Payment, and Delivery Reform, Health System Costs, Hospital/Health System Oversight, Making the Case for Action, State Employee Health Plans, Value-Based Purchasing /by Johanna ButlerA new, independent analysis of the Montana state employee health plan’s transition to reference-based pricing – which limits hospital prices to a multiple of what Medicare pays – found significant savings for the state in the two years after its implementation. Further, there is no evidence that utilization artificially increased as a result of the new payment […]